Will My Patrella Dislocate Again After a First Time

What's the correct management for someone with a 1st-time dislocation of their patella?

The answer is like shooting fish in a barrel and really quite indisputable: the answer is send them for imaging !

---

Risk of Redislocation After Master Patellar Dislocation: A Clinical Prediction Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Variables.
Arendt EA, Askenberger K, Agel J, Tompkins MA.
Am J Sports Med2018; 46(14): 3385-3390

---

In contempo years there'due south been an increasing number of papers published looking at whether or non early surgery is appropriate for someone presenting with their get-go e'er patellar dislocation. Early surgery is good if information technology prevents farther dislocations; all the same, surgery carries with it the risks of potential infection, neurovascular harm, blood clots etc, as well as causing pain, hassle, time off work etc etc.

Information technology has in the past been quoted that the risk of a 1^st-fourth dimension patellar dislocater dislocating once more, subsequently, is but about about 17% [Fithian]. However, Arendt et al.'south recent report showed a 42% charge per unit of recurrent dislocation inside 2 years after principal dislocation [Arendt]. Even if Fithian's figures are the more than accurate of the two, one could still argue that a majority of first-time dislocations do notend upwards dislocating over again. This could exist put forrad every bit an argument to back up the conservative management of all first-time dislocaters.

The trouble with recurrent dislocation is that it leads to progressive attenuation of the medial patellofemoral ligament and medial retinaculum. In add-on, increasing anticipation leads to fright abstention, which leads to musculus inhibition with wasting and weakness (especially of the VMO), which further increases the take a chance of recurrent dislocation and a downwards spiral. Furthermore, importantly, every time a patella dislocates there's a risk of progressive articular cartilage harm within the patellofemoral joint, which significantly increases the long-term risk of future patellofemoral arthritis.

So, afterward initial consideration, information technology seems like shooting fish in a barrel: conservative management with intensive physio rehab for a first-time dislocater and potential surgical stabilisation for a recurrent dislocator. Like shooting fish in a barrel… but wrong!

Starting time of all, when someone dislocates their patella, the medial side of the patella tends to bear on difficult against the lateral border/side of the lateral femoral condyle. This causes a typical blueprint of bone bruising on MRI; however, the master business concern is what potential articular cartilage harm might have been acquired inside the patellofemoral compartment. If the patient with a contempo dislocation has a clamper of loose cartilage / bone cleaved off within the joint and / or areas of unstable articular cartilage impairment, then these are best treated surgically, arthroscopically, to remove whatever loose bodies and to stabilise the articular cartilage damage by radiofrequency chondroplasty. [LINK]

How are y'all going to know whether or not the patient does have significant articular cartilage impairment? The respond is elementary: the patient needs an MRI scan! (preferably on a high-res 3T scanner).

So, for this reason lone, the respond to the question of how i should manage a kickoff-time patella dislocater is elementary: send them for imaging.

Non all people are the aforementioned! Most studies take cohorts of patients with a particular disease or diagnosis and compare the outcomes of different treatments for those patients. However, at that place's an supposition here that all the patients in each cohort are broadly the aforementioned. Researchers e'er check comparative cohorts for bones demographics such as historic period, sex etc., but these really are simply the absolute basics. Are all people's knees the aforementioned and practise all people take similar risks for instability? The answer is a very obvious 'no'!

The recent paper past Arendt et al. highlights elegantly how certain risk factors tin can be identified from MRI that can help predict the adventure of futurity recurrent dislocation. These risk factors include:

• Age: the younger the patient is, the greater the risk of farther dislocations.
• Sex: the gamble of further dislocations is higher in females.
• The magnitude of the trauma: the lower the energy of the accident where the patellar dislocation occurred and the more innocuous the injury, the more than likely it is that the patient had an inherent predisposition to instability.
• History of previous dislocations in that same human knee: the more times one dislocates one's patella, the more than likely information technology is that the patella volition merely dislocate once more.
• Patellofemoral dysplasia [LINK]
• Patella alta [LINK]
• Patellar maltracking / increased TT-TG distance [LINK]

Patellar skyline X-rays showing patellofemoral dysplasia.

Lateral articulatio genus X-ray showing patella alta.

Fine-cut CT scan with 3D recon, showing an externally rotated tibial tuberosity.

Parikhet al [Parikh] have recently taken iv of the chief run a risk factors for recurrent dislocation and created a very easy algorithm to assist in the prediction of recurrent instability. These adventure factors are:

1. Skeletal immaturity
2. History of contralateral dislocation
3. Trochlear dysplasia
4. Patella alta

Their recommended algorithm is:

Risk Factors	Average predicted risk of recurrence	Treatment recommendation
0	13.8%	Conservative handling
1	thirty.1%	Conservative treatment
ii	53.vi%	Surgery optional
3	74.8%	Surgical treatment
4	88.4%	Surgical treatment

Similarly, in Arendt et al.'southward study, iii specific factors were highlighted as factors that contribute to an increased adventure of farther dislocations, being:

1. skeletal immaturity,
2. trochlear dysplasia (an increased sulcus angle), and
3. patella alta (a reduced Insall Salvati ratio).

They calculated that the risk of further patellar dislocation after first-fourth dimension dislocation correlated very strongly with the number of take a chance factors nowadays:

• 0 risk factors nowadays = v.8% adventure of farther dislocations
• 1 risk gene nowadays = 22.7% risk of further dislocations
• 3 hazard factors nowadays = 78.5% run a risk of farther dislocations!

Chiefly, for one to be able to make these important predictions ane needs to be able to identify and accurately measure each of the specific private risk factors… in item, i needs a full appreciation of the morphological characteristics of the patient's patellofemoral joint, and in particular trochlear morphologyand patellar elevation. These factors can just be assessed and measured via appropriate imaging.

So, once again, appropriate imaging is key.

Only past obtaining appropriate imaging can one A) exclude significant patellofemoral articular cartilage damage, B) delineate the exact patellofemoral anatomy/morphology, and thus C) define the possible chance factors for potential recurrent dislocation and therefore D) advise the patient properly near the most appropriate way forward, in terms of treatment.

In my practice, unless at that place's a chondral loose body or really astringent/unstable articular cartilage damage, and so the very large majority (near all) of first-time patella dislocaters volition be managed at least initially conservatively, with appropriate physiotherapy rehab. Withal, if you don't look properly then sooner or later you lot're going to miss something important, and y'all can't give a full and measured opinion without first having all the necessary data. Therefore, the answer to the question as to how all-time to manage a first-time patellar dislocater is simple: all patients should be referred to a specialist knee surgeon for a total cess and for imaging prior to a fully informed discussion then being had which then guides the decision-making in terms of actual treatment. Don't get me wrong, imaging is not the be-all and end-all, and indeed you treat the patient, non the 'motion picture'. However, appropriate imaging is essential for the clinician to have the total moving-picture show and all the necessary information to be able to make a condom and appropriate informed decision with respect to how best to then suggest the patient about the almost appropriate treatment options for their private knee.

Conclusions

• Any patient sustaining a patellar dislocation must exist sent for an MRI scan ASAP (preferably on a high-res 3T scanner).

• If the patient hasn't already previously had farther patellofemoral imaging, then they should also be sent for X-rays with:

1. a weight-bearing AP view,
2. a lateral view and
3. a patellar skyline view.

• If you desire to encounter the patellofemoral anatomy really clearly, with the best possible views, then yous should also get a fine-cut CT scan with 3D reconstruction and with special trochlear views (with the tibia and the patella removed, and with the femur flexed to xxx degrees).

• You shouldn't make decisions about patient treatments without actually fully involving the patient themselves in the conclusion-making process, and you lot can't give informed consent to treatment without being fully informed… and you can't be fully informed unless you've got the full data….. and y'all can't possibly have the full information without having the full appropriate imaging.

READING

Arendt EA, Askenberger M, Agel J, Tompkins MA. Risk of Redislocation After Principal Patellar Dislocation: A Clinical Prediction Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Variables. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46(fourteen): 3385-3390. LINK

Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation.Am J Sports Med 2004;32(5):1114–1121. LINK

Parikh SN, Lykissas MG and Gkiatas I. Predicting Hazard of Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med2018 Jun; 11(2): 253–260.LINK

---

Written by:

Mr Ian McDermott  MB BS, MS, FRCS(Orth), FFSEM(United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland)
Consultant Knee Surgeon, London Sports Orthopaedics
Honorary Professor Associate, Brunel University
world wide web.kneesurgeon.london
www.sportsortho.co.uk

powellthosped.blogspot.com

Source: https://sportsortho.co.uk/blog/research-watch-whats-the-correct-management-for-someone-with-a-1st-time-dislocation-of-their-patella/

Share this post